General Assembly adopts pandemic treaty, but falls short of consensus
The General Assembly on Monday adopted a political declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, by 153 in favour to three against (Argentina, Israel and United States) with two abstentions (New Zealand…
Source: United Nations News · October 13, 2026 at 11:31 AM · AI-assisted report
Single-source
UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, 13 OCTOBER 2026 —
UN General Assembly Adopts Pandemic Declaration After US-Led Opposition Forces Vote Instead of Consensus
The United Nations General Assembly on Monday adopted a political declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response by a vote of 153 in favor, three against (Argentina, Israel, and the United States), and two abstentions (New Zealand and Paraguay), after objections from Washington and other nations blocked a consensus agreement at a high-level meeting on September 25.
The declaration’s adoption by a formal vote—rather than the intended consensus—marks a rare public rift at the UN over global health governance, underscoring deep divisions between developed and developing nations on issues ranging from pathogen data-sharing to vaccine equity. The text, while non-binding, calls for stronger international cooperation guided by science, equity, and human rights, and explicitly welcomes the WHO’s landmark Pandemic Agreement—a legally binding treaty whose finalization has stalled over disputes.
---
The declaration’s passage came after months of negotiations that collapsed when the US and its allies objected to language linking the agreement to ongoing talks on the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS) annex, a contentious mechanism designed to ensure fair distribution of vaccines, treatments, and diagnostics derived from shared genetic samples and data.
The US representative had previously cited “divisive ideologies that lack definitional consensus” as a key concern, alongside objections to the declaration’s framing of the annex negotiations as an urgent priority.
Developing nations, led by Chile’s representative, argued that no single country—regardless of size or preparedness—could address a pandemic alone. “This is a threat that knows no borders,” Chile’s delegate said, echoing calls from global health advocates for a unified, equitable response. The declaration’s adoption, while symbolic, signals a growing impatience among member states to move beyond rhetoric toward concrete action, particularly as the WHO’s Pandemic Agreement—negotiated over two years—remains incomplete.
---
The stumbling block is the PABS annex, which would require countries to share pathogen samples and genetic sequences in exchange for a share of any resulting medical countermeasures. Talks have deadlocked between developing nations, who demand fair compensation and technology transfer, and high-income countries—including the US and some European allies—who argue the terms are too prescriptive and could hinder innovation.
The World Health Assembly, comprising the WHO’s 194 members, is scheduled to revisit the annex in May 2027, but progress remains uncertain without a breakthrough in negotiations.
The WHO welcomed the declaration as a “strong commitment” to collaboration but urged member states to accelerate work on the PABS annex to allow the Pandemic Agreement to open for signature. “The world has come a long way since COVID-19,” WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a statement.
“Now, countries must fulfill their commitments—especially on the annex—so the agreement can enter into force as international law.” The US’s opposition, in particular, has drawn criticism from public health experts, who argue that its stance risks isolating Washington on a global issue with direct implications for future outbreaks.
---
Beyond the pandemic declaration, the General Assembly on Monday also advanced other draft resolutions, including one on the UN Declaration on Sea Level Rise and a political declaration marking the 25th anniversary of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action on anti-racism. However, the pandemic-related vote dominated proceedings, reflecting its urgency in a post-COVID world where new health threats—such as avian influenza, antimicrobial resistance, and potential lab-engineered pathogens—continue to emerge.
In parallel, the WHO launched a five-year strategy for its Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence, established in 2021 to detect emerging health threats within 24 hours. The hub, which operates in collaboration with member states, aims to equip every country with the tools to identify and contain outbreaks before they spread internationally.
While the initiative is seen as a critical step in early warning systems, its effectiveness will depend on global cooperation—an area where the recent vote highlights persistent fractures.
---
For Malaysia and regional Southeast Asian nations, the UN’s divided stance on pandemic governance carries significant implications. As a middle-income country with a history of balancing global health cooperation with domestic priorities, Malaysia has historically supported equitable access to medical tools, including during COVID-19. The PABS annex negotiations directly impact Malaysia’s ability to participate in global health research while ensuring fair benefits from any resulting innovations.
The country’s stance in future WHO deliberations will likely reflect its dual role as both a developing nation seeking fair terms and a regional player with growing pharmaceutical and biotech capabilities.
The declaration’s adoption also underscores the need for ASEAN to present a unified position in upcoming WHO discussions, particularly as the region remains vulnerable to infectious disease outbreaks. With the Pandemic Agreement’s fate hinging on the PABS annex, Malaysia and its neighbors will watch closely whether the May 2027 World Health Assembly can bridge the divide—or if the US’s objections will further delay a legally binding framework.
The last substantive development in the story is the WHO’s call for immediate action on the PABS annex, with the next critical juncture set for May 2027, when the World Health Assembly will reconvene to address the impasse. The outcome of those talks will determine whether the Pandemic Agreement—long awaited as a cornerstone of global health security—can finally be realized.
Related: United Nations General Assembly
Malaysia Impact
3/10Malaysia’s participation in global health governance and access to equitable medical tools (e.g., vaccines, diagnostics) may be affected by stalled PABS annex negotiations, given its middle-income status and pharmaceutical/biotech sector. ASEAN unity in WHO discussions could also be tested.
policycommodities