Mary Chia admits lapses in disclosing CPF arrears at four subsidiaries after SGX queries
Mary Chia said the omission was due to gaps in its internal information consolidation and other processes.
Source: Straits Times Business · October 11, 2026 at 9:31 AM · AI-assisted report
Single-source
SINGAPORE, 11 OCTOBER 2026 —
Mary Chia Holdings admits disclosure failures over $103,727 in CPF arrears across five subsidiaries after SGX RegCo intervention
Market Impact
Singapore-listed beauty and wellness group Mary Chia Holdings has acknowledged significant lapses in corporate disclosure after failing to reveal CPF arrears and court proceedings involving four of its five subsidiaries in a September 11 announcement, despite its CEO being aware of the legal notices as early as July.
The admission, made in an October 9 response to Singapore Exchange Regulation (SGX RegCo), exposes systemic weaknesses in the company’s internal information consolidation processes and raises fresh questions about its financial governance amid mounting legal and financial pressures.
The disclosure failure underscores broader concerns about Mary Chia’s operational transparency at a time when the company is grappling with insolvency threats, auditor reservations, and a contentious loan dispute with corporate lender Fullink Capital.
With net current liabilities exceeding $12.58 million and cash reserves of just $310,000 as of March 31, the group’s ability to navigate these challenges hinges on its capacity to strengthen disclosure controls and secure additional funding—including a planned $1 million equity raise announced last week.
---
The omission of the CPF-related matters stemmed from a narrow focus during the company’s initial disclosure assessment, which centered solely on Mary Chia Beauty & Slimming Specialist, the subsidiary whose $50,208 in arrears had triggered SGX RegCo’s inquiry.
The group admitted that its human resources, finance, and management functions failed to consolidate information effectively, leading to the exclusion of four other subsidiaries—Masego, Organica International Holdings, Spa Menu, and Urban Homme Face & Body Studio for Men—from the September 11 announcement.
The revised total of outstanding CPF contributions now stands at $103,727 as of October 9, a reduction from the approximately $153,000 cited during a court hearing on September 10.
The CPF Board’s updated computation, provided on October 9, breaks down the arrears as follows: - Mary Chia Beauty & Slimming Specialist: $52,266 (November 2025–May 2026) - Organica International Holdings: $25,248 (November 2025–May 2026) - Masego: $11,341 (November 2025–April 2026) - Urban Homme Face & Body Studio for Men: $9,847 (September 2025–March 2026) - Spa Menu: $5,025 (February 2026)
The periods reflect only months with unpaid contributions, not cumulative monthly arrears. The revised figure excludes late-payment interest and composition sums, though the group has been making progressive payments since June 2026, including $29,734 disbursed on October 6–7. An additional $12,570 in September 2026 contributions remains outstanding across three subsidiaries, with payment due by October 15.
---
The timeline of awareness within Mary Chia’s leadership reveals a critical disconnect. CEO Ho Yow Ping and the group’s human resources manager were notified of the court summonses upon receipt, while Ho attended an interview with the CPF Board on July 22 regarding the arrears.
However, the two independent directors, Chay Yiowmin and Foo Say Tun, only learned of the full scope of the CPF issues—including the four previously undisclosed subsidiaries—on October 8, the day after the consolidated court hearing.
The directors had first been informed of CPF discrepancies during an internal audit meeting on May 25, when management disclosed findings from an internal review and rectification reports submitted to the CPF Board. Yet the court proceedings themselves were not escalated to the board until after the September 10 hearing, when all five subsidiaries appeared together in court for the first time. Their cases were adjourned to November 12.
The CPF Board had initially issued nine separate notices to the subsidiaries but consolidated them in August at the group’s request. Mary Chia’s latest filing confirms that the arrears arose from administrative lapses rather than financial incapacity, though the company’s sponsor, Evolve Capital Advisory, had earlier disputed this characterization, arguing that the court proceedings represented a significant escalation warranting immediate investor disclosure.
---
The disclosure lapses come amid a broader crisis for Mary Chia, which faces multiple legal and financial threats. On September 30, the High Court paused insolvency proceedings brought by Fullink Capital over a $350,000 loan extended to Organica International Holdings, pending the transfer of $651,498.97 into court as security. Mary Chia maintains that providing the security does not constitute an admission of liability for Fullink’s claims.
Separately, the group announced on October 6 plans to raise $1 million through a 100 million new share issuance to four investors, including founder Mary Chia Ah Tow, to support overseas expansion. However, the company’s financial health remains precarious: its independent auditor issued a disclaimer of opinion on its March 31 financial statements, citing insufficient evidence on staff costs, borrowings, and its ability to continue as a going concern.
In response to the disclosure failures, Mary Chia has pledged to review and strengthen its internal reporting and disclosure procedures, particularly regarding statutory liabilities, regulatory matters, and legal proceedings. The board has also confirmed that, to the best of its knowledge, all material information required by SGX has been disclosed. Yet the repeated missteps—compounded by auditor reservations and legal disputes—raise urgent questions about the group’s governance and its ability to regain investor confidence.
--- The immediate next step for Mary Chia is the November 12 court hearing, where the CPF Board will determine the resolution of the outstanding contributions. Meanwhile, the company’s equity raise and ongoing negotiations with Fullink Capital will be closely watched by stakeholders as indicators of its financial stability.
With net liabilities far exceeding its cash reserves, the group’s ability to avoid insolvency proceedings hinges on its execution of these measures—and its commitment to transparency moving forward.
Related: Mary Chia Holdings