Commentary: Are perceptions of university prestige changing as Asian institutions rise up the ranks?
University rankings are shifting, but they do not automatically rewrite long-held beliefs about what a “good” university looks like, says mum writer June Yong. SINGAPORE: Every year, the release of global university rankings triggers a familiar ripple of celebration, anxiety and comparison for students as well as their parents. The latest Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) rankings continue to reflect As
Source: Channel NewsAsia · August 16, 2026 at 10:20 PM · AI-assisted report
SINGAPORE, 17 AUGUST 2026 —
Listen to this article
DomainFork Audio · read aloud
Asian Universities Gain Ground in Global Rankings, But Prestige Perceptions Lag Behind
Market Impact
KUALA LUMPUR/SINGAPORE — The latest Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings show Asian institutions consolidating their rise, yet long-standing perceptions of Western universities as the gold standard persist among Malaysian and regional families, according to analysts and parents.
The QS 2027 rankings, released this month, highlight continued gains for universities in China, Hong Kong, and South Korea, while Singapore retained its strong position with two institutions in the global top 12. Malaysian universities, including Universiti Malaya and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, also featured in the top 200, reflecting steady regional progress.
Yet experts note that rankings alone do not reshape entrenched beliefs about university prestige. For older generations, names like Oxford, Cambridge, or the Ivy League still carry symbolic weight that transcends metrics. "Places like MIT, Harvard, and Oxford attract strong teachers and students," said Evelyn Tan, a Singapore-based mother whose daughter focused exclusively on universities within the QS top 50—predominantly Western institutions—during her selection process.
Shifting Student Flows, Persistent Preferences
Beyond Singapore, the rise of Asian universities has broadened the range of institutions students consider. The QS rankings indicate that the international student ratio has increased in Hong Kong, Malaysia, and South Korea, while the US and UK have seen year-on-year declines due to tighter restrictions on international student intakes and post-study work visas.
Malaysia, in particular, has positioned itself as an education hub, hosting over 170,000 international students in 2025, according to government data. Local universities such as Universiti Teknologi Malaysia and Universiti Sains Malaysia have climbed steadily in regional rankings, offering competitive programmes in engineering, medicine, and business.
However, Tan’s experience reflects a broader trend: even as Asian universities gain visibility, many Malaysian families still prioritise Western institutions when evaluating prestige. "When it comes to local universities, ranking was less relevant in influencing decisions as all the major names are of comfortable standing," Tan said, echoing the sentiment of parents who view domestic options as reliable but not aspirational.
Beyond the Rankings: Fit Over Prestige
Analysts caution that rankings provide only a partial picture of educational quality. "They do not reveal whether a student will enjoy the curriculum, thrive in the campus culture, or feel a sense of belonging," wrote June Yong, a Singapore-based mother and programme lead at Focus on the Family Singapore, in a commentary for Channel NewsAsia.
Yong, who pursued a partial scholarship at an Australian university after polytechnic, emphasised the importance of aligning university choice with personal aspirations. "The better question is whether a particular institution, course, and environment align with a young person’s interests and goals," she noted.
This perspective resonates in Malaysia, where students and parents increasingly weigh factors beyond rankings, such as industry connections, affordability, and cultural fit. Local universities have strengthened ties with multinational corporations and government-linked entities, offering internships and career pathways that rival those of overseas institutions.
Parental Guidance vs. Student Autonomy
The tension between parental expectations and student autonomy remains a defining feature of university decision-making in Malaysia. Parents often bring financial resources and long-term perspectives, while students prioritise personal growth and self-discovery.
Tan adopted a collaborative approach with her daughter, involving mentors from diverse backgrounds to provide neutral perspectives. "A neutral third party can help young people reflect more objectively and come to their own conclusions," she said. This method has helped reduce friction in discussions about higher education pathways.
In Malaysia, where education is a high-stakes family investment, such dynamics are common. Parents may push for programmes perceived as "safer" or more lucrative, while students gravitate toward fields aligned with their passions. Universities in Asia, with their growing reputations and lower costs compared to Western counterparts, are increasingly seen as viable alternatives.
Regional Impact: Malaysia’s Education Strategy
Malaysia’s higher education sector has actively courted international students, leveraging its multicultural environment and affordable tuition fees. The government’s Education Malaysia initiative aims to attract 250,000 international students by 2025, with a focus on quality assurance and industry collaboration.
Local universities have responded by expanding research output and forging partnerships with global institutions. Universiti Malaya, ranked 65th in the QS 2027 rankings, has seen a 15% increase in research funding over the past two years, while Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia has strengthened its ties with ASEAN universities.
Yet challenges remain. Critics argue that Malaysia’s education system still grapples with brain drain, as top graduates seek opportunities abroad. Additionally, while rankings provide a benchmark, they do not account for the unique strengths of Malaysian institutions, such as their multicultural campuses and strong regional networks.
Stakeholder Perspectives: Voices from the Ground
Educators and policymakers in Malaysia acknowledge the shifting landscape but stress the need for balanced decision-making. "Rankings are a useful starting point, but they should not dictate choices," said Professor Datuk Dr. Noor Azuan Abu Osman, Vice-Chancellor of Universiti Malaya. "What matters most is whether a student’s potential is nurtured in an environment that suits their learning style."
Student organisations echo this sentiment. "Many of my peers are exploring options in South Korea, Japan, and China, not just because of rankings, but because of the opportunities available," said Aisyah Rahman, a final-year student at Universiti Teknologi MARA. "Affordability and cultural fit play a big role in our decisions."
The Road Ahead: Redefining Success in Higher Education
As Asian universities continue to rise in global rankings, the conversation around university prestige is evolving. For Malaysian families, the challenge lies in balancing tradition with opportunity, prestige with practicality.
Experts suggest that the focus should shift from where a university ranks to how well it aligns with a student’s goals. "The right university is one where a young person can learn, grow, and thrive—not just one that sits at the top of a scorecard," Yong wrote.
For Malaysia, this could mean leveraging its strengths as a regional education hub while addressing gaps in research funding and industry integration. With more students considering Asian universities, the country stands to benefit from a more diverse and dynamic higher education landscape.
As the global higher education sector transforms, the question for Malaysian families is no longer just about prestige—but about finding the right fit in an increasingly interconnected world.
Related: Singapore