Skip to content
Breaking
How the Sales and Purchase Agreement worksWhy Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explainsNebal-Tibet disaster: Flood rescue operations resume after brief suspensionAPT28-Linked HOOKEDGE Backdoor Targets European Government and Diplomatic Organizations‘Buying opportunity’: Sembcorp’s India unit IPO could lift group value by up to 10%PaperCut Zero-Day Exploited in Attacks, Affecting All NG and MF VersionsIndonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Await Fed SignalsBNPB DSP, Health Ministry: Medical costs for NTT earthquake victims freeAvaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong salesIndonesia urges community-led reconstruction for quake-hit NTT homesBelgian startup Any raises €10 million for production of LUV1 electric motorcycleRoad accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deathsMah Sing lifts 2Q net profit 9.8% as revenue jumps 16%Startup community gathers in New York on September 10 to debate AI-driven business modelsWe need to decide if the given headline is already fluent natural English. The headline: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". This seems a bit odd: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". It reads like a response to Mark Zuckerberg? The phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is somewhat awkward. Usually you'd say "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not yet for everyone" or "No, Mark Zuckerberg: the future is not (yet) for everyone". The parentheses around "yet" maybe okay. But the phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is a bit unnatural. It could be interpreted as addressing Mark Zuckerberg: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". That is a direct address, but the comma after Zuckerberg is correct for direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". Actually direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone." That is grammatical: youVirtual power plant pilot in Malaysia serves fewer than 1,000 households after three yearsMalaysia Secures RM218.5 Billion Approved Investments in 1H 2026, Jobs Rise 8.4%Import tariff transmission in a production network | Makram Khalil, Pierre M. Rouillard, Felix StrobelIndonesia’s growth outlook holds despite global headwindsPSE wraps 2026 mid-year STAR investor briefing with 13 live presentationsHow the Sales and Purchase Agreement worksWhy Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explainsNebal-Tibet disaster: Flood rescue operations resume after brief suspensionAPT28-Linked HOOKEDGE Backdoor Targets European Government and Diplomatic Organizations‘Buying opportunity’: Sembcorp’s India unit IPO could lift group value by up to 10%PaperCut Zero-Day Exploited in Attacks, Affecting All NG and MF VersionsIndonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Await Fed SignalsBNPB DSP, Health Ministry: Medical costs for NTT earthquake victims freeAvaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong salesIndonesia urges community-led reconstruction for quake-hit NTT homesBelgian startup Any raises €10 million for production of LUV1 electric motorcycleRoad accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deathsMah Sing lifts 2Q net profit 9.8% as revenue jumps 16%Startup community gathers in New York on September 10 to debate AI-driven business modelsWe need to decide if the given headline is already fluent natural English. The headline: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". This seems a bit odd: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". It reads like a response to Mark Zuckerberg? The phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is somewhat awkward. Usually you'd say "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not yet for everyone" or "No, Mark Zuckerberg: the future is not (yet) for everyone". The parentheses around "yet" maybe okay. But the phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is a bit unnatural. It could be interpreted as addressing Mark Zuckerberg: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". That is a direct address, but the comma after Zuckerberg is correct for direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". Actually direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone." That is grammatical: youVirtual power plant pilot in Malaysia serves fewer than 1,000 households after three yearsMalaysia Secures RM218.5 Billion Approved Investments in 1H 2026, Jobs Rise 8.4%Import tariff transmission in a production network | Makram Khalil, Pierre M. Rouillard, Felix StrobelIndonesia’s growth outlook holds despite global headwindsPSE wraps 2026 mid-year STAR investor briefing with 13 live presentations
Video

Nebal-Tibet disaster: Flood rescue operations resume after brief suspension

More than 1,000 people are still missing two days after a tsunami-like wall of water and mud crashed down on the Nepal-China border. Rescue efforts in Nepal and China were briefly halted on Friday (Aug 28) after a lake formed by a landslide on the Nepal-China border started to overflow. The catastrophic floods on Wednesday , caused by a glacier collapse, has killed nearly 490 people in Nepal and

Source: Channel NewsAsia · August 28, 2026 at 10:01 AM · AI-assisted report

Single-source
Nebal-Tibet disaster: Flood rescue operations resume after brief suspension
Photo: Wikimedia Commons — China–Nepal border

NEPAL-CHINA BORDER, 28 AUGUST 2026 —

Listen to this article

DomainFork Audio · read aloud

Share

Nepal-Tibet Floods: Rescue Operations Resume After Brief Halt

Market Impact

More than 1,000 people remain missing two days after a glacier collapse triggered catastrophic floods along the Nepal-China border. Rescue efforts were temporarily suspended on Friday (Aug 28) after a landslide-formed lake upstream began overflowing, raising concerns of further flooding. The disaster, which struck on Wednesday, has claimed nearly 490 lives in Nepal and five in China’s Tibet region.

Rescue operations in both countries were briefly halted for 90 minutes before authorities deemed the risk from the upstream dammed lake manageable. China resumed operations shortly after, followed by Nepal. The floods, described as a "tsunami-like wall of water and mud," have left nearly 1,000 people unaccounted for across the two nations.

Details not yet available on the exact number of displaced persons or the extent of infrastructure damage. Authorities have not provided updates on potential long-term risks, such as further landslides or secondary flooding.

The outlook remains uncertain as rescue teams assess the situation. Further disruptions to operations could occur if additional landslides or unstable terrain are detected. International aid agencies may be mobilized if the crisis escalates.

Related: Nepal-China border

Reporting based on Channel NewsAsia. Figures and claims are subject to revision as the story develops. DomainFork publishes editorial context, not investment advice — see our editorial standards.