Skip to content
Breaking
How the Sales and Purchase Agreement worksWhy Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explainsNebal-Tibet disaster: Flood rescue operations resume after brief suspensionAPT28-Linked HOOKEDGE Backdoor Targets European Government and Diplomatic Organizations‘Buying opportunity’: Sembcorp’s India unit IPO could lift group value by up to 10%PaperCut Zero-Day Exploited in Attacks, Affecting All NG and MF VersionsIndonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Await Fed SignalsBNPB DSP, Health Ministry: Medical costs for NTT earthquake victims freeAvaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong salesIndonesia urges community-led reconstruction for quake-hit NTT homesBelgian startup Any raises €10 million for production of LUV1 electric motorcycleRoad accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deathsMah Sing lifts 2Q net profit 9.8% as revenue jumps 16%Startup community gathers in New York on September 10 to debate AI-driven business modelsWe need to decide if the given headline is already fluent natural English. The headline: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". This seems a bit odd: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". It reads like a response to Mark Zuckerberg? The phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is somewhat awkward. Usually you'd say "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not yet for everyone" or "No, Mark Zuckerberg: the future is not (yet) for everyone". The parentheses around "yet" maybe okay. But the phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is a bit unnatural. It could be interpreted as addressing Mark Zuckerberg: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". That is a direct address, but the comma after Zuckerberg is correct for direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". Actually direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone." That is grammatical: youVirtual power plant pilot in Malaysia serves fewer than 1,000 households after three yearsMalaysia Secures RM218.5 Billion Approved Investments in 1H 2026, Jobs Rise 8.4%Import tariff transmission in a production network | Makram Khalil, Pierre M. Rouillard, Felix StrobelIndonesia’s growth outlook holds despite global headwindsPSE wraps 2026 mid-year STAR investor briefing with 13 live presentationsHow the Sales and Purchase Agreement worksWhy Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explainsNebal-Tibet disaster: Flood rescue operations resume after brief suspensionAPT28-Linked HOOKEDGE Backdoor Targets European Government and Diplomatic Organizations‘Buying opportunity’: Sembcorp’s India unit IPO could lift group value by up to 10%PaperCut Zero-Day Exploited in Attacks, Affecting All NG and MF VersionsIndonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Await Fed SignalsBNPB DSP, Health Ministry: Medical costs for NTT earthquake victims freeAvaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong salesIndonesia urges community-led reconstruction for quake-hit NTT homesBelgian startup Any raises €10 million for production of LUV1 electric motorcycleRoad accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deathsMah Sing lifts 2Q net profit 9.8% as revenue jumps 16%Startup community gathers in New York on September 10 to debate AI-driven business modelsWe need to decide if the given headline is already fluent natural English. The headline: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". This seems a bit odd: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". It reads like a response to Mark Zuckerberg? The phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is somewhat awkward. Usually you'd say "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not yet for everyone" or "No, Mark Zuckerberg: the future is not (yet) for everyone". The parentheses around "yet" maybe okay. But the phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is a bit unnatural. It could be interpreted as addressing Mark Zuckerberg: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". That is a direct address, but the comma after Zuckerberg is correct for direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". Actually direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone." That is grammatical: youVirtual power plant pilot in Malaysia serves fewer than 1,000 households after three yearsMalaysia Secures RM218.5 Billion Approved Investments in 1H 2026, Jobs Rise 8.4%Import tariff transmission in a production network | Makram Khalil, Pierre M. Rouillard, Felix StrobelIndonesia’s growth outlook holds despite global headwindsPSE wraps 2026 mid-year STAR investor briefing with 13 live presentations
Video

Road accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deaths

Singapore police reported on Friday that road traffic accidents and casualties rose in the first six months of 2026 compared with the same period last year, even as fatal accidents and deaths fell.

Source: Channel NewsAsia · August 28, 2026 at 9:39 AM · AI-assisted report

Single-source
Road accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deaths
Photo: Jason An / Unsplash

SINGAPORE, KUALA LUMPUR, BUKIT TIMAH EXPRESSWAY (BKE), 28 AUGUST 2026 —

Listen to this article

DomainFork Audio · read aloud

Share

Singapore police reported on Friday that road traffic accidents and casualties rose in the first six months of 2026 compared with the same period last year, even as fatal accidents and deaths fell.

Market Impact

Traffic accidents causing injury or death climbed 2.7% to 3,929 from 3,826 in January-June 2025, while total casualties increased 3.6% from 4,973 to 5,151, according to the mid-year traffic report. Fatal accidents fell 22.8% to 60 from 78, and road deaths dropped 22.8% to 61 from 79.

The police attributed the decline in fatalities mainly to fewer deaths among motorcyclists and pillion riders. They cautioned that the longer-term trend remains worrying, noting road deaths have climbed every year since 2020, reaching a decade-high of 149 in 2025.

Elderly pedestrians and motorcyclists remain the most vulnerable groups. Accidents involving elderly pedestrians rose 19% to 132 cases, up from 106, with 38.9% linked to unsafe behaviour such as jaywalking and crossing outside designated crossings. Though pedestrian fatalities fell 40% to nine, this group still accounted for half of all pedestrian deaths in the period.

Motorcyclists and pillion riders were involved in 2,186 accidents, up from 2,096, and accounted for 55.6% of all road accidents and 45.9% of road deaths. The top causes were failure to keep a proper lookout, loss of control and failure to exercise due care when changing lanes.

Speeding violations surged 6.1% to 126,976, with police citing enhanced enforcement and wider use of red-light cameras. Red-light running violations fell 31.7% and related accidents declined to 102 from 106.

Drink-driving arrests edged up 1.6% to 888 from 874, while drink-driving accidents dropped 8.1% and fatalities fell to four from five.

Police are testing average-speed enforcement on expressways using camera systems that calculate vehicle speeds over a section of road. Cameras at entry and exit points flag vehicles exceeding the average speed limit, though no summons will be issued during the trial.

Traffic Police commander Serene Chiu said the drop in fatalities is encouraging but emphasised that the rising trend in accidents and injuries shows more work is needed.

“Road safety is a shared responsibility and all road users must play their part,” she said.

Related: Serene Chiu

Reporting based on Channel NewsAsia. Figures and claims are subject to revision as the story develops. DomainFork publishes editorial context, not investment advice — see our editorial standards.