Uzbekistan Revisits Death Penalty After Child Abuse Conviction Sparks Fresh Debate
The debate over the death penalty is back in Uzbekistan, this time involving the country’s most senior officials.
Source: The Diplomat · September 30, 2026 at 6:32 PM · AI-assisted report
Single-sourceKUALA LUMPUR, 1 OCTOBER 2026 —
Uzbekistan’s Death Penalty Debate Reignites as Child Abuse Case Sparks Elite Intervention
Market Impact
The death penalty has returned to Uzbekistan’s political agenda after a brutal child sexual abuse case in Namangan district, with the president’s daughter and senior lawmakers publicly demanding its reinstatement for crimes against minors—a radical shift in a country that abolished capital punishment in 2008 and remains bound by international human rights obligations.
The case involves a five-year-old girl allegedly raped repeatedly by a kindergarten facilities manager in Uchkurgan, Namangan, whose mother discovered the abuse after noticing the man’s suspicious behavior toward her daughter. The mother, who described the perpetrator as a neighbor, said he had groomed the child with promises of sweets and gifts while threatening her into silence.
The incident has triggered a national outcry, with high-ranking officials—including Saida Mirziyoyeva, head of the presidential administration and deputy chair of the Security Council—calling for legislative changes to reintroduce the death penalty for such crimes. Meanwhile, the government has accelerated measures to shield the victim, relocate her family, and draft stricter penalties, even as critics warn of systemic failures that allowed the abuse to occur.
The case is the second high-profile child sexual assault in Namangan within a year, reviving a debate that last flared in 2024 after a seven-year-old girl was raped by a previously convicted offender. That incident sparked public demands for capital punishment, but this time, the discussion has reached the highest echelons of power.
On September 27, Mirziyoyeva, the president’s daughter, posted on Telegram that the death penalty “should be used for such heinous crimes,” acknowledging that current law does not permit it. “We are preparing a proposal to amend the legislation to maximize liability for this type of crime,” she stated, signaling an unprecedented intervention by a senior official in the legal debate.
Her remarks were swiftly amplified by Alisher Qodirov, leader of the Milliy Tiklanish (National Revival) Democratic Party and deputy speaker of parliament, who described the death penalty as a “necessity.” Qodirov, known for nationalist and sometimes controversial statements, framed the issue as a moral imperative. “The continued existence of those who intentionally kill innocent people, especially child murderers and pedophiles, is a motivation for further crimes of this kind!” he wrote, reposting Mirziyoyeva’s message.
His stance echoes his 2024 comments following the murder of a three-year-old girl, when he called for “cleansing” society of such criminals, arguing that taxpayer-funded incarceration was “illogical” for “animals” who commit atrocities.
The debate has exposed deep divisions within Uzbekistan’s political establishment. While Mirziyoyeva and Qodirov push for capital punishment, Bobur Bekmurodov, a member of the Legislative Chamber and leader of the Yuksalish movement, has vehemently opposed the idea. In a direct rebuttal, Bekmurodov warned that reinstating the death penalty could endanger child victims, violate the constitution, and risk judicial errors.
“If child rape is punishable by death, there is nothing to stop the perpetrator from destroying the only witness—the child himself,” he wrote, highlighting the practical dangers of such a measure.
Qodirov’s arguments have taken a provocative turn, invoking the case of Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik to question Uzbekistan’s adherence to international law. He claimed that Western legal standards prioritize the rights of criminals over victims, citing Breivik’s complaints about prison conditions—despite the fact that Breivik’s communications remain censored and he has not published a book while incarcerated. “Whose footsteps are we following?!
We will also be forced to create conditions for our pedophile if he asks, because the international law we follow sees him as a human being, not as a dead person,” Qodirov wrote, framing the debate as a clash between Uzbek values and global human rights norms.
As the political storm rages, the government has taken concrete steps to address the immediate crisis. The investigation, now under the prosecutor general’s control, has seen involvement from Shakhnoza Mirziyoyeva, another daughter of President Shavkat Mirziyoyev and first deputy director of the National Agency for Social Protection. She announced that the victim’s family would be relocated to another city, provided with housing, and given a new surname to protect their privacy.
The Ministry of Preschool and School Education has also formed a working group to address the incident, though details of its findings remain undisclosed.
Yet beneath the political posturing lies a damning indictment of Uzbekistan’s child protection systems. The mother of the survivor revealed that security cameras at the kindergarten—supposedly overseen by the alleged perpetrator—had not recorded the abuse. She also claimed that the perpetrator’s wife attempted to bribe her to drop the case.
The kindergarten director, who was on holiday during the incident, insisted in a statement to police that children were never left unsupervised, while the girl’s teacher similarly denied any lapse in oversight. “Not an hour, not a minute, would [she] be left unattended,” the teacher stated, though no independent verification of these claims has been provided.
The government’s response has focused on punitive measures rather than systemic reform. On September 29, a new bill was introduced to the Legislative Chamber to increase penalties for violence against children, though Qodirov signaled his party’s neutrality on the proposal while reaffirming support for the death penalty. Meanwhile, Shakhnoza Mirziyoyeva announced that her agency, in collaboration with other bodies, is drafting a law to impose life imprisonment for child sexual abuse crimes.
“We also propose to strengthen the responsibility of parents for neglecting children and of educators for allowing violence and discrimination, and to provide legal assistance and protection to child victims at every stage of the investigation and trial,” her agency stated in a Telegram post.
The case underscores the scale of Uzbekistan’s child protection crisis. Official data from 2022 to 2026 indicates that 445 cases of rape involving minors under 14 years old were recorded, though activists and NGOs suggest the true figure is far higher due to underreporting.
The government’s focus on retribution over prevention—combined with the silence surrounding the perpetrator’s identity and the systemic failures exposed—raises questions about whether the debate will lead to meaningful change or merely serve as a distraction from deeper institutional weaknesses.
For now, the political elite has united in outrage, with officials rushing to demonstrate action. But as the victim’s mother and other survivors have shown, the real failure lies not in the absence of a death penalty, but in the systems that allowed the abuse to happen in the first place—and continue to fail children across Uzbekistan.