Skip to content
Breaking
ServiceNow warns of three maximum-severity security vulnerabilitiesWindows 11 KB5120998 update released with 35 changes and fixesHow the Sales and Purchase Agreement worksWhy Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explainsNepal and China restart flood rescues after upstream lake threat easesAPT28-Linked HOOKEDGE Backdoor Targets European Government and Diplomatic OrganizationsSembcorp Industries' India unit IPO could raise group value by up to 10%PaperCut zero-day under active exploit in all versionsIndonesia stocks slip 0.06% as Fed, BI leadership weigh on marketNTT earthquake victims to receive free medical care funded by BNPBAvaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong salesIndonesia urges community-led reconstruction for quake-hit NTT homesBelgian startup Any raises €10 million for production of LUV1 electric motorcycleRoad accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deathsMah Sing lifts 2Q net profit 9.8% as revenue jumps 16%Startup community gathers in New York on September 10 to debate AI-driven business modelsWe need to decide if the given headline is already fluent natural English. The headline: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". This seems a bit odd: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". It reads like a response to Mark Zuckerberg? The phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is somewhat awkward. Usually you'd say "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not yet for everyone" or "No, Mark Zuckerberg: the future is not (yet) for everyone". The parentheses around "yet" maybe okay. But the phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is a bit unnatural. It could be interpreted as addressing Mark Zuckerberg: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". That is a direct address, but the comma after Zuckerberg is correct for direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". Actually direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone." That is grammatical: youVirtual power plant pilot in Malaysia serves fewer than 1,000 households after three yearsMalaysia Secures RM218.5 Billion Approved Investments in 1H 2026, Jobs Rise 8.4%Import tariff transmission in a production network | Makram Khalil, Pierre M. Rouillard, Felix StrobelServiceNow warns of three maximum-severity security vulnerabilitiesWindows 11 KB5120998 update released with 35 changes and fixesHow the Sales and Purchase Agreement worksWhy Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explainsNepal and China restart flood rescues after upstream lake threat easesAPT28-Linked HOOKEDGE Backdoor Targets European Government and Diplomatic OrganizationsSembcorp Industries' India unit IPO could raise group value by up to 10%PaperCut zero-day under active exploit in all versionsIndonesia stocks slip 0.06% as Fed, BI leadership weigh on marketNTT earthquake victims to receive free medical care funded by BNPBAvaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong salesIndonesia urges community-led reconstruction for quake-hit NTT homesBelgian startup Any raises €10 million for production of LUV1 electric motorcycleRoad accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deathsMah Sing lifts 2Q net profit 9.8% as revenue jumps 16%Startup community gathers in New York on September 10 to debate AI-driven business modelsWe need to decide if the given headline is already fluent natural English. The headline: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". This seems a bit odd: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". It reads like a response to Mark Zuckerberg? The phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is somewhat awkward. Usually you'd say "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not yet for everyone" or "No, Mark Zuckerberg: the future is not (yet) for everyone". The parentheses around "yet" maybe okay. But the phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is a bit unnatural. It could be interpreted as addressing Mark Zuckerberg: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". That is a direct address, but the comma after Zuckerberg is correct for direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". Actually direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone." That is grammatical: youVirtual power plant pilot in Malaysia serves fewer than 1,000 households after three yearsMalaysia Secures RM218.5 Billion Approved Investments in 1H 2026, Jobs Rise 8.4%Import tariff transmission in a production network | Makram Khalil, Pierre M. Rouillard, Felix Strobel
Malaysia

Why Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explains

Rising bond yields and renewed inflationary pressures are raising concerns about Asia’s growth outlook. But could the region’s investment boom offer a...

Source: The Business Times Singapore · August 28, 2026 at 10:01 AM · AI-assisted report

Single-source

SINGAPORE, 28 AUGUST 2026 —

Listen to this article

DomainFork Audio · read aloud

Share

Asia’s Inflation Risks May Be Overstated, Says Morgan Stanley Economist

Market Impact

Rising bond yields and renewed inflationary pressures have sparked concerns over Asia’s growth outlook, but a surge in regional capital expenditure could counterbalance these risks. Economists are closely monitoring inflation trends in Australia and Singapore, as well as rate hikes by the Philippines and South Korea, amid persistent US inflation and elevated bond yields. However, Derrick Kam, Asia Economist at Morgan Stanley, suggests the situation may be less dire than recent data suggests.

Malaysia Market Impact: Limited Direct Exposure Expected

While regional inflation dynamics may influence investor sentiment, Malaysia’s market reaction is expected to remain measured. Analysts note that Malaysia’s inflation remains within manageable levels, supported by stable domestic demand and controlled food prices.

Morgan Stanley Economist Highlights Nuanced Inflation Picture

In an interview with The Business Times, Kam emphasized that Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated. He pointed to strong capital expenditure (capex) growth as a key driver of regional resilience, suggesting that investment-led expansion could offset inflationary pressures. Kam’s analysis contrasts with recent inflation spikes in Australia and Singapore, where price pressures have prompted monetary tightening.

Outlook: Cautious Optimism Amid Global Uncertainty

The outlook for Asia remains cautiously optimistic, with capex growth expected to sustain economic momentum. However, risks persist from stubborn US inflation and volatile bond markets. Investors are advised to monitor Fed signals and regional policy responses.

Related: Morgan Stanley · Derrick Kam

Reporting based on The Business Times Singapore. Figures and claims are subject to revision as the story develops. DomainFork publishes editorial context, not investment advice — see our editorial standards.