Skip to content
Breaking
How the Sales and Purchase Agreement worksWhy Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explainsNebal-Tibet disaster: Flood rescue operations resume after brief suspensionAPT28-Linked HOOKEDGE Backdoor Targets European Government and Diplomatic Organizations‘Buying opportunity’: Sembcorp’s India unit IPO could lift group value by up to 10%PaperCut Zero-Day Exploited in Attacks, Affecting All NG and MF VersionsIndonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Await Fed SignalsBNPB DSP, Health Ministry: Medical costs for NTT earthquake victims freeAvaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong salesIndonesia urges community-led reconstruction for quake-hit NTT homesBelgian startup Any raises €10 million for production of LUV1 electric motorcycleRoad accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deathsMah Sing lifts 2Q net profit 9.8% as revenue jumps 16%Startup community gathers in New York on September 10 to debate AI-driven business modelsWe need to decide if the given headline is already fluent natural English. The headline: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". This seems a bit odd: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". It reads like a response to Mark Zuckerberg? The phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is somewhat awkward. Usually you'd say "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not yet for everyone" or "No, Mark Zuckerberg: the future is not (yet) for everyone". The parentheses around "yet" maybe okay. But the phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is a bit unnatural. It could be interpreted as addressing Mark Zuckerberg: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". That is a direct address, but the comma after Zuckerberg is correct for direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". Actually direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone." That is grammatical: youVirtual power plant pilot in Malaysia serves fewer than 1,000 households after three yearsMalaysia Secures RM218.5 Billion Approved Investments in 1H 2026, Jobs Rise 8.4%Import tariff transmission in a production network | Makram Khalil, Pierre M. Rouillard, Felix StrobelIndonesia’s growth outlook holds despite global headwindsPSE wraps 2026 mid-year STAR investor briefing with 13 live presentationsHow the Sales and Purchase Agreement worksWhy Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explainsNebal-Tibet disaster: Flood rescue operations resume after brief suspensionAPT28-Linked HOOKEDGE Backdoor Targets European Government and Diplomatic Organizations‘Buying opportunity’: Sembcorp’s India unit IPO could lift group value by up to 10%PaperCut Zero-Day Exploited in Attacks, Affecting All NG and MF VersionsIndonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Await Fed SignalsBNPB DSP, Health Ministry: Medical costs for NTT earthquake victims freeAvaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong salesIndonesia urges community-led reconstruction for quake-hit NTT homesBelgian startup Any raises €10 million for production of LUV1 electric motorcycleRoad accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deathsMah Sing lifts 2Q net profit 9.8% as revenue jumps 16%Startup community gathers in New York on September 10 to debate AI-driven business modelsWe need to decide if the given headline is already fluent natural English. The headline: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". This seems a bit odd: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". It reads like a response to Mark Zuckerberg? The phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is somewhat awkward. Usually you'd say "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not yet for everyone" or "No, Mark Zuckerberg: the future is not (yet) for everyone". The parentheses around "yet" maybe okay. But the phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is a bit unnatural. It could be interpreted as addressing Mark Zuckerberg: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". That is a direct address, but the comma after Zuckerberg is correct for direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". Actually direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone." That is grammatical: youVirtual power plant pilot in Malaysia serves fewer than 1,000 households after three yearsMalaysia Secures RM218.5 Billion Approved Investments in 1H 2026, Jobs Rise 8.4%Import tariff transmission in a production network | Makram Khalil, Pierre M. Rouillard, Felix StrobelIndonesia’s growth outlook holds despite global headwindsPSE wraps 2026 mid-year STAR investor briefing with 13 live presentations
Malaysia

BNPB DSP, Health Ministry: Medical costs for NTT earthquake victims free

Health Ministry, BNPB Waive Medical Costs for Earthquake Victims in NTT

Source: ANTARA News · August 28, 2026 at 9:39 AM · AI-assisted report

Single-source
BNPB DSP, Health Ministry: Medical costs for NTT earthquake victims free
Image: antaranews.com

EAST NUSA TENGGARA (NTT), JAKARTA, INDONESIA, KUALA LUMPUR, 28 AUGUST 2026 —

Listen to this article

DomainFork Audio · read aloud

Share

Health Ministry, BNPB Waive Medical Costs for Earthquake Victims in NTT

Market Impact

KUALA LUMPUR (Aug 28): The Indonesian Ministry of Health (Kemenkes) has announced that medical treatment for victims of the recent earthquake in East Nusa Tenggara (NTT) will be fully covered under the BPJS Kesehatan scheme, with costs reimbursed through the National Disaster Management Authority’s (BNPB) Dana Siap Pakai (DSP) fund.

Speaking at a press conference in Jakarta on Friday, Deputy Health Minister Dante Saksono Harbuwono said the agreement with BPJS Kesehatan ensures that all medical expenses—including emergency surgeries—will be processed under the national health insurance program, with BNPB covering the claims via the DSP mechanism.

“Some may ask where the funding for medical operations comes from. We have reached an agreement with BPJS that patients can use BPJS facilities, and the claims will be paid through BNPB’s DSP. Hopefully, the funds will be disbursed tomorrow,” he said.

As of the latest assessment, approximately 15,000 individuals have been affected by the earthquake, with 187 in critical condition, 914 in emergency-stable condition, 13,881 non-emergency cases, and 162 fatalities. Critical and some emergency-stable patients who could not be treated at local health centers were evacuated to referral hospitals, including RSUD Komodo, RSUD Borong, RSUD Ruteng, RS TC. Hillers, RSUD Ende, RSUD Aeramo, and RSK Ksatria Airlangga.

A total of 391 referrals were made, with 19 patients dying during or after evacuation. The most common injuries included open fractures, head trauma, and vertebral injuries, while other cases involved pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes and fetal distress. Over the past two weeks, 20 births were recorded, all delivered safely.

The Health Ministry has outlined a three-phase disaster recovery strategy for NTT’s healthcare system. The first phase involves immediate patient triage, evacuation, and referral. The third phase focuses on restoring damaged healthcare facilities, including identifying affected primary and referral centers, compiling reports, and finalizing budgets—currently under calculation.

Market Impact in Malaysia While the earthquake’s direct economic impact on Malaysia remains limited, regional insurers and reinsurers with exposure to Indonesian risks may monitor claims arising from the disaster. Analysts suggest that if BPJS Kesehatan’s reimbursement process faces delays, it could temporarily strain BNPB’s disaster funds, though the Indonesian government has assured prompt disbursement.

The healthcare sector in Malaysia, particularly companies with operations in Indonesia, may observe operational adjustments in NTT’s medical facilities. However, no immediate supply chain disruptions have been reported.

Sector and Company Specifics BPJS Kesehatan, Indonesia’s national health insurer, will process claims under its existing infrastructure, leveraging the DSP fund—a mechanism previously used in other disaster responses. BNPB’s DSP allocation for this event remains undisclosed, though the ministry has indicated funds will be released within days.

Indonesian healthcare providers, including state-run hospitals in NTT, are coordinating with BPJS to streamline claims. No private hospital groups have been explicitly mentioned in the response, suggesting a reliance on public facilities for initial disaster relief.

Outlook The Indonesian government’s swift coordination between Kemenkes, BPJS Kesehatan, and BNPB signals a structured approach to disaster healthcare funding. If successful, the DSP-BPJS model could serve as a template for future emergencies. However, challenges remain in ensuring timely fund disbursement and maintaining healthcare service continuity in affected areas.

Details on long-term recovery funding and infrastructure repairs are not yet available. Further updates are expected as assessments progress.

Related: BPJS Kesehatan · Dante Saksono Harbuwono

Reporting based on ANTARA News. Figures and claims are subject to revision as the story develops. DomainFork publishes editorial context, not investment advice — see our editorial standards.