Skip to content
Breaking
How the Sales and Purchase Agreement worksWhy Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explainsNebal-Tibet disaster: Flood rescue operations resume after brief suspensionAPT28-Linked HOOKEDGE Backdoor Targets European Government and Diplomatic Organizations‘Buying opportunity’: Sembcorp’s India unit IPO could lift group value by up to 10%PaperCut Zero-Day Exploited in Attacks, Affecting All NG and MF VersionsIndonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Await Fed SignalsBNPB DSP, Health Ministry: Medical costs for NTT earthquake victims freeAvaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong salesIndonesia urges community-led reconstruction for quake-hit NTT homesBelgian startup Any raises €10 million for production of LUV1 electric motorcycleRoad accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deathsMah Sing lifts 2Q net profit 9.8% as revenue jumps 16%Startup community gathers in New York on September 10 to debate AI-driven business modelsWe need to decide if the given headline is already fluent natural English. The headline: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". This seems a bit odd: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". It reads like a response to Mark Zuckerberg? The phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is somewhat awkward. Usually you'd say "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not yet for everyone" or "No, Mark Zuckerberg: the future is not (yet) for everyone". The parentheses around "yet" maybe okay. But the phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is a bit unnatural. It could be interpreted as addressing Mark Zuckerberg: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". That is a direct address, but the comma after Zuckerberg is correct for direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". Actually direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone." That is grammatical: youVirtual power plant pilot in Malaysia serves fewer than 1,000 households after three yearsMalaysia Secures RM218.5 Billion Approved Investments in 1H 2026, Jobs Rise 8.4%Import tariff transmission in a production network | Makram Khalil, Pierre M. Rouillard, Felix StrobelIndonesia’s growth outlook holds despite global headwindsPSE wraps 2026 mid-year STAR investor briefing with 13 live presentationsHow the Sales and Purchase Agreement worksWhy Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explainsNebal-Tibet disaster: Flood rescue operations resume after brief suspensionAPT28-Linked HOOKEDGE Backdoor Targets European Government and Diplomatic Organizations‘Buying opportunity’: Sembcorp’s India unit IPO could lift group value by up to 10%PaperCut Zero-Day Exploited in Attacks, Affecting All NG and MF VersionsIndonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Await Fed SignalsBNPB DSP, Health Ministry: Medical costs for NTT earthquake victims freeAvaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong salesIndonesia urges community-led reconstruction for quake-hit NTT homesBelgian startup Any raises €10 million for production of LUV1 electric motorcycleRoad accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deathsMah Sing lifts 2Q net profit 9.8% as revenue jumps 16%Startup community gathers in New York on September 10 to debate AI-driven business modelsWe need to decide if the given headline is already fluent natural English. The headline: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". This seems a bit odd: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". It reads like a response to Mark Zuckerberg? The phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is somewhat awkward. Usually you'd say "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not yet for everyone" or "No, Mark Zuckerberg: the future is not (yet) for everyone". The parentheses around "yet" maybe okay. But the phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is a bit unnatural. It could be interpreted as addressing Mark Zuckerberg: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". That is a direct address, but the comma after Zuckerberg is correct for direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". Actually direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone." That is grammatical: youVirtual power plant pilot in Malaysia serves fewer than 1,000 households after three yearsMalaysia Secures RM218.5 Billion Approved Investments in 1H 2026, Jobs Rise 8.4%Import tariff transmission in a production network | Makram Khalil, Pierre M. Rouillard, Felix StrobelIndonesia’s growth outlook holds despite global headwindsPSE wraps 2026 mid-year STAR investor briefing with 13 live presentations
Companies

Avaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong sales

Avaland Bhd’s net profit surged 41% quarter-on-quarter to RM17.1 million in the three months to June 30, 2026.

Source: EdgeProp Malaysia · August 28, 2026 at 9:39 AM · AI-assisted report

Single-source
Avaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong sales
Image: edgeprop.my

PETALING JAYA, KUALA LUMPUR, TAMAN U-THANT, TAMAN DESA, PETALING JAYA, 28 AUGUST 2026 —

Listen to this article

DomainFork Audio · read aloud

Share

Avaland Bhd’s net profit surged 41% quarter-on-quarter to RM17.1 million in the three months to June 30, 2026.

Market Impact

The homebuilder attributed the gain to stronger construction progress and new project launches during the quarter, according to a filing released on August 27. Quarterly revenue rose 17% to RM174.3 million from RM149.4 million in the first quarter, while new sales climbed 46% to RM222.4 million.

“This strong take-up reflects sustained demand for our developments,” Apollo Bello Tanco, Avaland’s chief executive, said in the statement. The group’s premium portfolio continued to drive sales, he added.

Unbilled sales stood at RM941.1 million as at June 30, up 4% from RM904.9 million three months earlier. Avaland said ongoing and recently launched projects underpinned medium-term earnings visibility.

During the quarter the company acquired a 1.9-acre freehold site in Taman U-Thant, Kuala Lumpur, earmarked for a luxury residential scheme with an estimated gross development value of RM700 million. It also confirmed plans to launch two projects in the second half of 2026: Accent Petaling Jaya under its AVA Prime series and Aetas Taman Desa under its AVA Luxe series.

For the six months to June 30, 2026, Avaland’s net profit fell 4% to RM29.2 million from RM30.5 million a year earlier, even as revenue rose 7% to RM323.8 million. The group said it remained cautiously optimistic, citing continued demand for strategically located developments and its upcoming launch pipeline.

Avaland’s landbank totals about 76.5 hectares with an estimated gross development value of RM12.3 billion.

Related: Avaland Bhd · Apollo Bello Tanco

Reporting based on EdgeProp Malaysia. Figures and claims are subject to revision as the story develops. DomainFork publishes editorial context, not investment advice — see our editorial standards.