Skip to content
Breaking
How the Sales and Purchase Agreement worksWhy Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explainsNebal-Tibet disaster: Flood rescue operations resume after brief suspensionAPT28-Linked HOOKEDGE Backdoor Targets European Government and Diplomatic Organizations‘Buying opportunity’: Sembcorp’s India unit IPO could lift group value by up to 10%PaperCut Zero-Day Exploited in Attacks, Affecting All NG and MF VersionsIndonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Await Fed SignalsBNPB DSP, Health Ministry: Medical costs for NTT earthquake victims freeAvaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong salesIndonesia urges community-led reconstruction for quake-hit NTT homesBelgian startup Any raises €10 million for production of LUV1 electric motorcycleRoad accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deathsMah Sing lifts 2Q net profit 9.8% as revenue jumps 16%Startup community gathers in New York on September 10 to debate AI-driven business modelsWe need to decide if the given headline is already fluent natural English. The headline: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". This seems a bit odd: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". It reads like a response to Mark Zuckerberg? The phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is somewhat awkward. Usually you'd say "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not yet for everyone" or "No, Mark Zuckerberg: the future is not (yet) for everyone". The parentheses around "yet" maybe okay. But the phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is a bit unnatural. It could be interpreted as addressing Mark Zuckerberg: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". That is a direct address, but the comma after Zuckerberg is correct for direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". Actually direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone." That is grammatical: youVirtual power plant pilot in Malaysia serves fewer than 1,000 households after three yearsMalaysia Secures RM218.5 Billion Approved Investments in 1H 2026, Jobs Rise 8.4%Import tariff transmission in a production network | Makram Khalil, Pierre M. Rouillard, Felix StrobelIndonesia’s growth outlook holds despite global headwindsPSE wraps 2026 mid-year STAR investor briefing with 13 live presentationsHow the Sales and Purchase Agreement worksWhy Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explainsNebal-Tibet disaster: Flood rescue operations resume after brief suspensionAPT28-Linked HOOKEDGE Backdoor Targets European Government and Diplomatic Organizations‘Buying opportunity’: Sembcorp’s India unit IPO could lift group value by up to 10%PaperCut Zero-Day Exploited in Attacks, Affecting All NG and MF VersionsIndonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Await Fed SignalsBNPB DSP, Health Ministry: Medical costs for NTT earthquake victims freeAvaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong salesIndonesia urges community-led reconstruction for quake-hit NTT homesBelgian startup Any raises €10 million for production of LUV1 electric motorcycleRoad accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deathsMah Sing lifts 2Q net profit 9.8% as revenue jumps 16%Startup community gathers in New York on September 10 to debate AI-driven business modelsWe need to decide if the given headline is already fluent natural English. The headline: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". This seems a bit odd: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". It reads like a response to Mark Zuckerberg? The phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is somewhat awkward. Usually you'd say "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not yet for everyone" or "No, Mark Zuckerberg: the future is not (yet) for everyone". The parentheses around "yet" maybe okay. But the phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is a bit unnatural. It could be interpreted as addressing Mark Zuckerberg: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". That is a direct address, but the comma after Zuckerberg is correct for direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". Actually direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone." That is grammatical: youVirtual power plant pilot in Malaysia serves fewer than 1,000 households after three yearsMalaysia Secures RM218.5 Billion Approved Investments in 1H 2026, Jobs Rise 8.4%Import tariff transmission in a production network | Makram Khalil, Pierre M. Rouillard, Felix StrobelIndonesia’s growth outlook holds despite global headwindsPSE wraps 2026 mid-year STAR investor briefing with 13 live presentations
ASEAN

Indonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Await Fed Signals

Jakarta. Indonesia’s benchmark stock index ended the week slightly lower on Friday, as investors weighed clarity over Bank Indonesia’s next leadership against uncertainty surrounding the Federal ...

Source: RSS · August 28, 2026 at 10:01 AM · AI-assisted report

Single-source
Indonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Await Fed Signals
Image: jakartaglobe.id

KUALA LUMPUR, JAKARTA, JACKSON HOLE, KANSAS CITY, BURSA MALAYSIA, 28 AUGUST 2026 —

Listen to this article

DomainFork Audio · read aloud

Share

Indonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Weigh Fed Signals, Bank Indonesia Leadership

Market Impact

KUALA LUMPUR — Indonesia’s benchmark stock index ended the week slightly lower on Friday, as investors balanced optimism over the appointment of Bank Indonesia’s next governor against uncertainty surrounding the U.S. Federal Reserve’s interest-rate outlook.

The Jakarta Composite Index (JCI) slipped 0.06%, or 3 points, to close at 6,518, trading within a range of 6,495 to 6,566 during the session. A total of 35.2 billion shares changed hands, with turnover reaching Rp15.1 trillion ($853.37 million) across more than 2 million transactions. Declining stocks outnumbered gainers, with 328 shares falling, 276 advancing, and 188 unchanged.

Pilarmas Investindo Sekuritas noted that the Indonesian House of Representatives’ approval of Destry Damayanti as Bank Indonesia governor for the 2026-2031 term provided a positive domestic signal. The brokerage said the leadership transition is expected to reduce uncertainty over monetary policy direction while maintaining stability and market confidence in Indonesia’s financial markets.

Investor focus, however, remained on the U.S., where Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh was scheduled to speak at the annual Jackson Hole symposium later on Friday. Markets are seeking fresh clues on the direction of U.S. interest rates. Pilarmas said traders were pricing in a more than 70% probability of a Fed rate hike in December, while expectations for the September meeting pointed to around a 65% chance that rates would remain unchanged.

“Market participants are likely to wait for Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s speech at the annual Jackson Hole symposium for further clues on the outlook for U.S. interest rates,” Pilarmas said in a research note.

Comments from other Fed officials also remained on investors’ radar. Kansas City Fed President Jeff Schmid stated that current monetary policy was not holding back the economy.

While Asian markets mostly moved higher, providing some support to Jakarta, South Korea’s Kospi was the region’s biggest loser, falling 1.8%. Tokyo’s Nikkei rose 0.4%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng gained 0.2%, and the Shanghai Composite slipped 0.1%.

Investors were also monitoring renewed tensions between the U.S. and Iran after diplomatic efforts stalled, according to Pilarmas. The U.S. imposed new sanctions on Iran earlier in the week, which Tehran condemned as hostile and ineffective. However, the brokerage noted that markets appeared to be largely brushing off the sanctions threat.

Domestic sentiment in Indonesia remained relatively stable after demonstrations calling for the passage of the Asset Forfeiture Bill proceeded in an orderly manner.

Malaysia Market Impact

The decline in Indonesia’s benchmark index reflects broader cautious sentiment in regional equities as investors await clearer signals on global monetary policy. Malaysian investors closely monitor developments in Indonesia, given the strong trade and investment ties between the two economies. The JCI’s performance may influence sentiment in Bursa Malaysia, particularly for sectors with exposure to Indonesian markets, such as banking and consumer goods.

Sector and Company Specifics

Pilarmas Investindo Sekuritas highlighted the positive impact of Destry Damayanti’s appointment as Bank Indonesia governor, suggesting that continuity in monetary policy leadership could support investor confidence. The brokerage also noted that market participants are closely watching Fed signals, particularly given the potential for U.S. interest rate adjustments to impact capital flows into emerging markets like Indonesia.

Outlook

The near-term outlook for Indonesian equities remains contingent on developments in U.S. monetary policy and regional geopolitical stability. Investors will likely continue to monitor Fed communications, particularly following Warsh’s speech at Jackson Hole, for indications of future rate movements. Domestically, the stability of Indonesia’s political and economic environment, including the orderly passage of key legislation, will also play a crucial role in shaping market sentiment. Details not yet available on how Malaysian markets may specifically react to these developments.

Related: Pilarmas Investindo Sekuritas

Reporting based on RSS. Figures and claims are subject to revision as the story develops. DomainFork publishes editorial context, not investment advice — see our editorial standards.