Skip to content
Breaking
How the Sales and Purchase Agreement worksWhy Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explainsNebal-Tibet disaster: Flood rescue operations resume after brief suspensionAPT28-Linked HOOKEDGE Backdoor Targets European Government and Diplomatic Organizations‘Buying opportunity’: Sembcorp’s India unit IPO could lift group value by up to 10%PaperCut Zero-Day Exploited in Attacks, Affecting All NG and MF VersionsIndonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Await Fed SignalsBNPB DSP, Health Ministry: Medical costs for NTT earthquake victims freeAvaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong salesIndonesia urges community-led reconstruction for quake-hit NTT homesBelgian startup Any raises €10 million for production of LUV1 electric motorcycleRoad accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deathsMah Sing lifts 2Q net profit 9.8% as revenue jumps 16%Startup community gathers in New York on September 10 to debate AI-driven business modelsWe need to decide if the given headline is already fluent natural English. The headline: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". This seems a bit odd: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". It reads like a response to Mark Zuckerberg? The phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is somewhat awkward. Usually you'd say "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not yet for everyone" or "No, Mark Zuckerberg: the future is not (yet) for everyone". The parentheses around "yet" maybe okay. But the phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is a bit unnatural. It could be interpreted as addressing Mark Zuckerberg: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". That is a direct address, but the comma after Zuckerberg is correct for direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". Actually direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone." That is grammatical: youVirtual power plant pilot in Malaysia serves fewer than 1,000 households after three yearsMalaysia Secures RM218.5 Billion Approved Investments in 1H 2026, Jobs Rise 8.4%Import tariff transmission in a production network | Makram Khalil, Pierre M. Rouillard, Felix StrobelIndonesia’s growth outlook holds despite global headwindsPSE wraps 2026 mid-year STAR investor briefing with 13 live presentationsHow the Sales and Purchase Agreement worksWhy Asia’s inflation scare may be overstated: a Morgan Stanley economist explainsNebal-Tibet disaster: Flood rescue operations resume after brief suspensionAPT28-Linked HOOKEDGE Backdoor Targets European Government and Diplomatic Organizations‘Buying opportunity’: Sembcorp’s India unit IPO could lift group value by up to 10%PaperCut Zero-Day Exploited in Attacks, Affecting All NG and MF VersionsIndonesian Stocks End Week Lower as Investors Await Fed SignalsBNPB DSP, Health Ministry: Medical costs for NTT earthquake victims freeAvaland posts 41% quarterly net profit rise after strong salesIndonesia urges community-led reconstruction for quake-hit NTT homesBelgian startup Any raises €10 million for production of LUV1 electric motorcycleRoad accidents and injuries rise in first half of 2026 despite fewer deathsMah Sing lifts 2Q net profit 9.8% as revenue jumps 16%Startup community gathers in New York on September 10 to debate AI-driven business modelsWe need to decide if the given headline is already fluent natural English. The headline: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". This seems a bit odd: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". It reads like a response to Mark Zuckerberg? The phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is somewhat awkward. Usually you'd say "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not yet for everyone" or "No, Mark Zuckerberg: the future is not (yet) for everyone". The parentheses around "yet" maybe okay. But the phrase "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone" is a bit unnatural. It could be interpreted as addressing Mark Zuckerberg: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". That is a direct address, but the comma after Zuckerberg is correct for direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone". Actually direct address: "No, Mark Zuckerberg, the future is not (yet) for everyone." That is grammatical: youVirtual power plant pilot in Malaysia serves fewer than 1,000 households after three yearsMalaysia Secures RM218.5 Billion Approved Investments in 1H 2026, Jobs Rise 8.4%Import tariff transmission in a production network | Makram Khalil, Pierre M. Rouillard, Felix StrobelIndonesia’s growth outlook holds despite global headwindsPSE wraps 2026 mid-year STAR investor briefing with 13 live presentations
Economics

Indonesia’s growth outlook holds despite global headwinds

Indonesia’s economy is forecast to expand 5.3% in 2026 on resilient domestic demand and continued investment, according to the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO).

Source: ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office · August 28, 2026 at 9:01 AM · AI-assisted report

Single-source
Indonesia’s growth outlook holds despite global headwinds
Photo: Daivewoi Huongs via wikimedia (BY-SA)

INDONESIA, SINGAPORE, ASEAN+3 REGION, 28 AUGUST 2026 —

Listen to this article

DomainFork Audio · read aloud

Share

Indonesia’s Economic Resilience Hinges on Policy Consistency, AMRO Says

Market Impact

SINGAPORE, Aug 28, 2026 – Indonesia’s economic outlook remains, with growth projected at 5.3% in 2026, driven by resilient domestic consumption and steady investment. However, rising global oil prices are straining fiscal resources through higher energy subsidies, while financial market volatility underscores the need to maintain investor confidence. The ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) emphasized that fiscal sustainability, central bank independence, and coordinated policy communication will be critical to sustaining stability.

The assessment follows AMRO’s Annual Consultation Visit to Indonesia from July 27 to August 20, 2026, led by Group Head and Lead Economist Ravi Balakrishnan, alongside AMRO Director/CEO Yasuto Watanabe and Chief Economist Dong He. Discussions with Indonesian authorities focused on macroeconomic stability amid global uncertainty.

Indonesia’s growth forecast of 5.3% in 2026 is supported by domestic demand and government spending on priority programs, despite external pressures. “Prolonged high global energy prices and volatile capital flows are weighing on Indonesia’s outlook,” Balakrishnan noted. He stressed that carefully calibrated policies, clear communication, and inter-agency coordination will be essential to achieving intended outcomes while preserving Bank Indonesia’s focus on macroeconomic stability.

Inflation is projected to average 3.4% in 2026, remaining within the official target range. Subsidized energy prices are expected to cushion the impact of higher global oil prices, though risks from El Niño-driven agricultural disruptions and rupiah depreciation could push inflation above target temporarily. The current account deficit is projected to widen due to higher oil imports and corporate income repatriation, though portfolio inflows—particularly into Bank Indonesia Rupiah Securities (SRBI)—are expected to provide support. International reserves remain above conventional adequacy benchmarks despite recent moderation.

Fiscal discipline has been maintained, with the government rationalizing non-priority spending to keep the deficit at 2.8% of GDP in 2026, below the statutory 3% limit. Priority programs, including the Free Nutritious Meal and Red and White Village Cooperative initiatives, have been streamlined. Revenue gains from improved tax administration are expected to offset higher energy subsidies and program spending.

Bank Indonesia has responded to challenges with a cumulative 100-basis-point rate hike in May-June 2026, followed by a hold at 5.75%. The central bank has also strengthened monetary operations, foreign exchange measures, and macroprudential policies to support credit growth and rupiah stability. Indonesia’s banking sector remains resilient, with strong capital and liquidity buffers, sound asset quality, and profitability.

As a net oil importer, Indonesia faces external and fiscal pressures from elevated global energy prices, though higher commodity export prices could partially offset these effects. Portfolio outflows in early 2026 contributed to rupiah volatility, but net inflows in Q2—driven by SRBI—provided support. Market sensitivity to fiscal sustainability, governance, and policy predictability remains high.

Structural challenges persist, including a declining revenue-to-GDP ratio, a large informal sector, and commodity-dependent exports. However, potential upside factors include state-owned enterprise (SOE) reforms under Danantara and debottlenecking efforts. AMRO recommends enhancing revenue mobilization through tax administration improvements and broadening the tax base while maintaining the 3% deficit ceiling to anchor stability.

Monetary policy should prioritize rupiah and price stability, supported by clear communication and prudent reserve management. Strengthening investor confidence will require credible, coordinated policies across agencies. Financial inclusion efforts should complement credit infrastructure development, while capital market reforms must deepen domestic markets and improve infrastructure.

Long-term growth hinges on SOE governance, agricultural productivity, and human capital development. The Danantara Sovereign Wealth Fund presents opportunities, but governance and transparency will be. A coherent policy framework could foster high-performing enterprises, expand the middle class, and support Indonesia’s goal of achieving high-income status by 2045.

AMRO expressed gratitude to Indonesian authorities for their cooperation during the mission. As a regional surveillance body, AMRO supports macroeconomic resilience and financial stability in the ASEAN+3 region, which includes Malaysia, China, Japan, and South Korea.

Reporting based on ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office. Figures and claims are subject to revision as the story develops. DomainFork publishes editorial context, not investment advice — see our editorial standards.